Skip to content

Restaurant Results

Measured in more than rankings.

We track the visibility metrics that matter — and connect them wherever possible to restaurant discovery, bookings, covers and commercial performance.

Our position

A ranking is useful. A booked table is better.

Rankings, traffic and Google Maps visibility are all useful. None of them is the objective.

The commercial objective for a restaurant is to be discovered by more potential guests and to convert that demand into bookings and covers. Everything below is ordered that way: commercial evidence first, technical evidence underneath it.

Case studies

What changed, for which restaurant, over which period.

Client names are withheld under confidentiality — these are established, well-regarded Dublin restaurants, and their figures are their own. Every number is recorded from the named third-party source rather than internal reporting.

Chef-led landmark restaurant · name withheld · Dublin city centre

When the local market fell, this restaurant grew covers.

Aug 2024 – Jan 2026

Covers grew 33% year on year while a 75-venue OpenTable benchmark for the same area fell 9% — a 42 percentage-point spread.

Covers were declining year on year, slightly slower than the surrounding market. There was no map pack presence and no managed local search foundation underneath the venue.

+33%

Covers, year on year

Active build phase, Aug 2024 – Mar 2025

Source · OpenTable

−9%

Market, same period

75-venue South City Centre benchmark

Source · OpenTable

42pt

Gap versus benchmark

Percentage-point spread, not percentage growth

Source · OpenTable

View Case Study

Chef-led landmark restaurant · name withheld · Dublin city centre restaurant corridor

Entering an occupied market and ranking ahead of it.

Sep 2025 baseline – Feb 2026

From no non-branded visibility to a #7 Maps Pack position on Dublin's most contested restaurant discovery term.

Four well-resourced venues already held the discovery terms in Dublin's most competitive restaurant corridor. The venue did not rank on non-branded discovery terms at all.

#7

Maps Pack position

"best restaurants in dublin city centre"

Source · Bright Local · Local Finder

13

Positions ahead of nearest rival

Same term, same tracking window

Source · Bright Local · Local Finder

7

Tracked terms compared

Maps Pack, desktop and mobile organic

Source · Bright Local · Local Finder

View Case Study

Premium steakhouse group · name withheld · Dublin 2

Building local search infrastructure from the ground up.

Nov 2024 – Jan 2026 · 15 months

Fifteen months of local search infrastructure: Domain Authority 33 to 47, linking domains 104 to 197, 83% map pack coverage.

Strong brand, no digital foundation: below-average domain authority, no managed citations, and no map pack presence on the high-intent terms a new guest would actually use.

33 → 47

Domain Authority

Market average approximately 29 at engagement start

Source · Moz Domain Authority

104 → 197

Linking domains

+89% over the engagement

Source · Moz Domain Authority

83%

Map pack coverage

Across the tracked high-intent term set

Source · Local ranking tracking

View Case Study

Premium steakhouse group · name withheld · Dublin 2

Separating what search contributed from what the restaurant earned.

A three-tier model separating platform-confirmed booking revenue from what is inferred and what is deliberately not claimed.

The venue grew covers while the surrounding market declined. The question was how much of that gap could honestly be traced to digital work rather than claimed wholesale.

€184,940

Directly traced booking revenue

3,699 network covers × €50 average spend

Source · OpenTable

20pt

Gap versus local market

Venue +7% covers, Dublin 2 market −13%

Source · OpenTable

~50%

Share attributed to digital

Stated position, not a measured total

Source · OpenTable

View Case Study

Chef-led landmark restaurant · name withheld · Dublin city centre

How a restaurant search actually becomes a booking.

Full year 2025

766K profile views, 75% of them on Maps Mobile, and 19,600+ direction requests — mapped across five stages of guest discovery.

Understanding which surfaces guests genuinely use to choose a restaurant — and where the venue appeared, or did not, at each stage of that decision.

766K

Profile views

Full year 2025

Source · Google Business Profile Insights

75%

Of profile views via Maps Mobile

573,000 of 766,000 views

Source · Google Business Profile Insights

19,600+

Direction requests

Full year 2025

Source · Google Business Profile Insights

View Case Study

Premium steakhouse group · name withheld · Dublin 2

From falling covers to growth while the market fell further.

15-month documented engagement

Covers moved from −8% to +7% year on year while the Dublin 2 benchmark fell 13% — a 20 percentage-point gap.

Covers were falling roughly in line with a contracting Dublin 2 market, with below-average authority, inconsistent citations and almost no map pack coverage underneath a strong brand.

+7%

Venue covers, year on year

From −8% at engagement start

Source · OpenTable

−13%

Dublin 2 market, same period

205-venue benchmark cohort

Source · OpenTable

20pt

Gap versus market

+7% at the venue against −13% across the cohort

Source · OpenTable

View Case Study

Chef-led landmark restaurant · name withheld · Dublin city centre

The return set out as a ledger, with the assumptions published.

18-month engagement

Break-even at 12 additional covers a month against 521 attributed — a 43× return on the conservative attribution basis, with every input stated.

Two attribution bases were defensible for the same engagement. The question was which figure to publish and how to make the arithmetic checkable rather than something to be taken on trust.

43×

Return on retainer

Conservative attribution basis, roughly half the market gap

Source · OpenTable

12

Covers a month to break even

At the venue's own average spend per cover

Source · OpenTable

521

Attributed covers a month

Conservative basis over the engagement

Source · OpenTable

View Case Study

Chef-led landmark restaurant · name withheld · Dublin city centre

The complete day-one audit next to the month-eighteen result.

18 months

Domain Authority 15 to 44, zero managed citations to 107, an unclaimed profile to 766K views — eight categories measured twice.

A landmark name with no search foundation: Domain Authority 15, no managed citations, an unclaimed Google Business Profile and covers falling 7% year on year.

15 → 44

Domain Authority

Day 1 to month 18

Source · Moz Domain Authority

0 → 107

Citations established

From no managed citations at engagement start

Source · Local ranking tracking

766K

Profile views

Full year 2025

Source · Google Business Profile Insights

View Case Study

Premium steakhouse group · name withheld · Dublin 2

706,000 impressions — and the reservation page that leaks them.

Full engagement period

The full funnel from impression to action, including a reservation page served 124,501 times at a 1.15% click-through rate.

Strong top-of-funnel visibility does not guarantee capture. The question was where demand was being served in search but not converted into a click or a booking.

706K

Search impressions

Full engagement period

Source · Google Search Console

7.15%

Average organic click-through rate

26,182 organic clicks

Source · Google Search Console

1.15%

Reservation page click-through rate

124,501 impressions over five months

Source · Google Search Console

View Case Study

Market-relative performance

The clearest evidence is what the market did at the same time.

During the active build phase, the venue recorded +33% covers year on year while the 75-venue South City Centre benchmark recorded −9%. That is a 42 percentage-point spread, not 42% growth.

Covers, year on year · Aug 2024 – Mar 2025
  • This venue+33%

    38,523 covers recorded in the period

  • Market benchmark−9%

    75 competing venues, South City Centre

Source · OpenTable neighbourhood benchmark. Both series measured by the same platform over the same window.

What we measure

From visibility to commercial performance.

We combine search, local visibility, booking-platform and restaurant performance data to build a clearer picture of what is changing — without pretending every metric proves causation.

  1. 01

    Search visibility

    Measured

    Positions and impressions across search and Maps, tracked independently.

  2. 02

    Restaurant discovery

    Measured

    Profile views, discovery searches and local pack coverage.

  3. 03

    Profile & website actions

    Measured

    Direction requests, calls, website clicks and reservation taps.

  4. 04

    Bookings

    Partly traceable

    Platform-confirmed network bookings can be traced. Other channels cannot.

  5. 05

    Covers & commercial outcome

    Correlated

    Recorded against a market benchmark, not claimed as direct attribution.

Transparency

What we won’t promise.

  • We do not guarantee #1 rankings.
  • We do not manufacture attribution between platforms that measure different things.
  • We do not report activity simply to make a report look busy.
  • We focus on sustained restaurant discovery and measurable improvement.

Free Restaurant Visibility Audit

What could better visibility mean for your restaurant?

Start with a clear view of where your restaurant appears today, where competitors are winning, and where the biggest opportunities exist.

Results shown are historical examples from specific restaurant engagements. Outcomes vary by market, competition, starting position and implementation.